Comment: Walkscore 85/100. Building is LEED certified multifamily residence. You can view additional “green” features on website (VERY nice website!). All residence floors are configured the same except for the 6th floor.
Entire unit probably large for the amount of living spaces. Deducted points for what appeared to be supersized Master Bedroom and Bath. Study had no natural light so it scored 0. Laundry area was an afterthought–scored 0.
Project Name: Residence M Floor 27 (1900 McKinney)
Comment: Walkscore 85/100. LEED certified with additional “green” features (see website for details).
Had to make judgement call with “Siting” category. The apartment is impacted by stairwell on East side; corridor to the North; and Adjacent apartment on West. However, the view from the South and East corners (see pictures on floorplan) is spectacular SO I chose to score it “Yes” based on the view.
Supersized Master closet and odd entry to Master Bedroom resulted in score of 0.
No actual study but computer desk was in a dark hallway so I make a judgement call and scored the area 0.
Project Name: Residence I, Floor 27 (1900 McKinney)
New to slowhome? Want to try a hand at finding a condo/loft and applying the slowhome test? Here are a few things we have found that can help answer a test question.
To find if you have a location that does not require much use of a car there is great site you can use- http://www.walkscore.com/ . My rule of thumb is that it has to be 70 or higher to say YES.
For Siting (at first I thought sitting?). Google maps has satellite to help look at the surroundings. Sometimes you can see an actual street level view. It is as if you were standing there. http://maps.google.com/
Environmental Performance. Dallas can be hot. A unit that has most of its windows facing North is best. Hopefully the developer has a siteplan that you can refer to. GREEN. We love to see a redevelopment of a non residential building into housing as we see with some lofts. Does the site mention energy efficient appliances or windows or meeting/exceeding energy star standards? Some take that extra step to build something very friendly to the environment and have LEED ( http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CMSPageID=1988 )certification. List of buildings/projects can be seen here – http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CMSPageID=2135#Lists
Good luck in finding the slowest (and fastest) units in Dallas/Ft. Worth.
Mid America Mom
MollyK
Comment: Walkscore 85/100. LEED certified with additional “green” features viewed on website.
Env. Perf.: there is West light, however, energy-efficient windows should help reduce ambient heat. Also, other environmentally-friendly features outweigh impact of West light. Scored Yes.
Terrace and Dining scored 0. Area from dining should have been allocated to terrace which is only 60 sf.
Too many linen closets in MasterBath and MasterBedroom had a long, uninviting hallway. Both resulted in scores of 0.
Gave “study” a point because I thought the allocated space was useful even though there was no natural light.
Comment: Walkscore: 91/100
No environmental features, east facing into the courtyard = nice light
Wide, shallow unit with a strange triangular balcony. Most notable frustration for me would be trying to use the bathroom as a guest – in either case you’d be walking through someone’s bedroom.
Comment: Better unit slightly. West facing onto a park = good view, hot texas afternoon/evening sun directly into bedroom and living. Dining room is really bad – so bad that they couldn’t draw in a table that didn’t reveal this fact: there just isn’t enough room to make that space work.
Comment: Love this development. LOFTS with that window that is like a garage door. GREEN. You can see the rainwater collection tanks on mapquest street view. AND they throw in a moped and subscription to DWELL :)
What is not to like? That flex space near the entry door. I suspect they want that to be a study. It does not have natural light. You have a ways to get to the area that I suspect would be the bedroom.
Project Name: Buzz Lofts- Type B Unit 302
Size: 1075
Project Address: 1111 S. Akard, Dallas, Texas 75215
Comment: The worst part of this one is probably the completely enclosed and dark kitchen/den (what a strange combination). There is also a private elevator for those with stranger-phobia. Those little balconies are very strange indeed, not one could fit a barbecue (isn’t this texas? where do I cook my AAA t-bones?)
Comment: I couldn’t find the square footage for this one, but it looks pretty big (3 bedrooms and 3 bathrooms). Had to do a bit of sleuthing to find out its orientation – E side of the building with E, N and S light. Energy efficiency is a factor in the design. Overall a good unit, only concerns are the master bath layout and the distance between the bedrooms (split private spaces), and some wasted space here and there.
Comment: Walkscore 85/100. LEED certified, etc.
Click on “View Larger Plan” to view alternate plan for 26th & 27th floors. There is no terrace for either floor. I used this floorplan.
Env. Perf. scored 0 because only Northern exposure for light. And with added impact of 2 adjacent apartments and interior corridor, the floorplan immediately felt fast. Siting scored 0 also.
Dining space was ambiguous–scored 0.
Sorry, on Residence K the walkscore should read 85/100. Typo!
Alejandro
Comment: Very interesting story to this building – began as a bank, hit by tornado in 2000, added new mechanical penthouse, converted into condos. The unit is ruined by the 45 angle. No info on environmental features, and no site plan. Very good location, but not a unit of choice.
Project Name: The Tower – Unit C
Size: 923 sq ft
Project Address: 500 Throckmorton St Fort Worth, TX
Comment: Problems problems. Again with the 45 angle! Predilection for symmetry undermines functionality. How to orient the dining table??? Very awkward to use bathrooms, bedrooms are too small!!! Best part (only decent part) is right at the entry: a good sized closet, a hidden but accessible mechanical space, a good laundry room, access to kitchen if laden with groceries.
Project Name: The Tower – Unit B
Size: 1178 sq ft
Project Address: 500 Throckmorton St Fort Worth, TX
Comment: Walkscore 85/100. LEED certified with additional “green” features listed on website.
Env. Perf. score Yes: although the apartment is oriented only to the South, that view is particularly nice and with environmental features I could not see penalizing it.
Terrace is small BUT the entire unit is small so I felt the area was in keeping with the overall size.
Did not penalize for the absence of a study.
Comment: Walk Score 100! I found the enormous amount of storage in this unit hard to judge. I think it would be useful for someone to have this amount of storage in a loft unit but the long narrow entry into the bedroom I felt was quite awkward. By the way, John or Matthew, would you be able to clarify how scoring the siting would apply to lofts and apartments?
Comment: Walk Score 57. Although there is no entry, huge amounts of northern light floods the entire suite. However, the fact that you need to cross through the bedroom to get to the bathroom is a big negative.
Project Name: Lake Cliff Tower – Unit 6, Level 4
Size: 893 sqft
Project Address: 329 E. Colorado Blvd., Dallas, TX
Comment: Walk Score 91. I liked how they still tried to orient the unit as much to the north as possible. The unit shape is fairly awkward and i think if they designed it with one less bathroom the circulation might have worked a little better, especially the entry into the master bedroom.
Comment: Walk Score 91. This unit to me is extremely well laid out. With the unit facing north and having all services along the back wall, the organization is very good. Some of you may disagree with my score for the entry as its narrow but in all I still think it works very well with how the kitchen has been defined.
Comment: Walk Score 86. At first glance this plan seems very convoluted. Organizational strategy seems alright but the siting in terms of the whole buildings orientation I think is detrimental to the flow of the unit.
Project Name: The Residences at the Ritz-Carlton – Unit H604
Comment: The best part: have your roommate’s suite separate from yours. the worst part: that doing this leads to windowless study and where you’d actually want to put the dining table is in the way of the natural circulation route. I appreciate the vestibules in front of each bedroom (normally these are just doors making it awkward going from living room to bedroom). Is that kitchen island too close to the fridge? What if you wanted to grab something while someone was washing the dishes.
Project Name: Westview, Lone Star
Size: 1342 sq ft
Project Address: 1152-1198 W 10th St Fort Worth, TX
Comment: What terrible organization! Who approves these designs? There really is no dining, b/c it’s circulation, the laundry is through the kitchen, the massive, angled baths through the closets. It makes no sense.
Comment: My only beef is the closet through the bathroom… otherwise, this place looks pretty livable… oh and the lack of balcony crumbles the dream a bit.
Walk Score 40
Project Name: Las Colinas
Size: 1245
Project Address: One BD, Unit D, 1050 Lake Caorlyn PKWY, Irving
Comment: Walkscore: 46/100, no env. info. or north arrow. no site plan. Overall organization is good, the only issues I have, really, is the lack of privacy for the study and the way you access the powder room.
Comment: Look at that kitchen! Bathrooms aren’t working, poorly organized unit. Patio is a good size, but no idea if it gets good shade or if it’s blasted by low, hot west sun.
Comment: Okay, this is the new competitor for the WORST loft I’ve ever seen. Can you imagine a home where the bedroom is also the entry? Where there is no natural light? Where you can alsays see the kitchen from the “dining room”? Well, then this one’s for you!
Walk Score 100
I will acknowledge the awesomness of the community ameneties available for residents though… I might consider living in this nasty loft just for that.
Project Name: The Wilson
Size: 736
Project Address: 1bd, unit M, 1800 Main Street, Dallas
Comment: Southwest facing center unit will be overheated, no adverse neighbor/building services interactions. Good location (downtown Fort Worth across from city hall). Lots of wasted space due to curve, angle. No outdoor space at all (wonder if the windows are even operable)!
Project Name: 1301 Throckmorton – Residence E
Size: 873 sq ft
Project Address: 1301 Throckmorton St Fort Worth, TX
- project is a “green community”, applying for LEED recognition, looks like it’s amongst industrial/commercial buildings
- bedrooms are split into different wings of the apartment with the principle private spaces bisecting the plan, requires circulation path through the kitchen/living room, extra halls are required to access each of the bedrooms, awkward angled layout
– no entry space. Door leads straight into the kitchen.
– no focal point to arrange furniture around, living room more of a corridor to the exterior space from the kitchen
– good size exterior space, accessible from three different rooms. Enough room to accommodate seating arrangement.
– way too big for the space. In efficient layout spreads the kitchen out along the back walls –> dishwasher is really far from all the other appliances.
– no dining room
– good size, but 45 degree arrangement does reduce room for furniture (dresser, etc) within the space.
– bathrooms efficiently laid out, given the long shape of the rooms.
– no study
– laundry in a really strange shaped closet, lots of wasted space around the appliances. No room to work in front.
– outdoor parking lot
- Interesting case in the sense that the development received 6 points for context within the world (normally difficult to achieve), yet fails miserably on almost everything else –> had the siting potential, yet the interior space decisions take away from the success of the project
– fits in with the context of surrounding buildings, frames views of the downtown area
– public spaces front on to the exterior space (terrace)
– entry is small, in reality it is just a hallway, not really an entrance space
– living space has no focal point, however, really good connection to the exterior space and well aid out to accommodate furniture arrangement
– outdoor living space is large, accessible from principle living areas,
- dinig space is open concept with the living room/kitchen, but enough room to accommodate a table
– bedroom 2 has no window, everything else is positive
– bathrooms are intelligently laid out, a small amount of wasted space next to toilet in main bathroom (master en suite is well proportioned)
– no study
– only a laundry closet
– secure, garage parking listed in amenities
- In comparison with the previous project, this loft offers a great location (again, high scoring on the context scale) in addition to a well laid out unit (for the most part)
Comment: North by northeast facing corner unit. Overall proportions are great. Nice outdoor space. Columns cause problems in kitchen, dining area and bedroom 2. Powder room is unnecessary. Master bath is just bad. Supersized master bedroom. Could have been SO much better!
Project Name: 1301 Throckmorton – Residence B
Size: 2047 sq ft
Project Address: 1301 Throckmorton St Fort Worth, TX
– fits in with the context of surrounding buildings, frames views of the downtown area
– although bedrooms are split into different ends of the apartment, the circulation paths do not necessitate cutting through the spaces, No unnecessary hallways. Principle living spaces have really good connection to the exterior space
- entry does not open directly into the main living space
– living space no focal point per say, but strong connection to the exterior space and easily accommodates a furniture grouping
– huge outdoor terrace, easily accessible by a number of rooms
– kitchen is well organized and efficient
– dining space is a generous size and can easily accommodate a furniture grouping
– both bedrooms well laid out, good connection to outdoors, master bedroom closet is a little strange, but double entrance does allow for the maximum number of windows without wasting too much floor space
– both bathrooms are well organized
– no study
– again, just a laundry closet. Opens into dining room (not very nice)
– secure, garage parking listed in amenities
- Wanted to look at one of the larger units in the building to compare it to the much smaller ~700 sq ft unit analyzed earlier
- The extra square footage allows for a better entry, and corner layout allows both bedrooms to have that connection to the outdoors
- Exterior space is really generous, and a nice feature
– fits in with the context of surrounding buildings, a restored art deco building
- Private spaces towards front, public spaces towards the rear of the unit
– no proper entry, door opens into ling corridor that spans the length of the apartment
– no focal point, but large living room can easily accommodate furniture, windows to exterior
– no exterior space, although the communal roof top terrace (not accessible from the unit) is quite nice
– kitchen is an efficient space
– no dining room; however, would likely fit within the large living space, but not identified as a space on the plan
– bedroom is labelled as the study, no natural light/ventilation
– clean, simple bathrooms
– no natural lighting source in “study”
– laundry is once again just a closet
– secure, garage parking listed in amenities
- Small size and long narrow unit really limits the success of the overall layout.
- After looking through a few of the other suites in the building, it becomes interesting because they’re either really quite large (yet still not well laid out) or too small like this unit.
– LEED Building – or at the very least, a green developer
- fits in with the context of surrounding buildings, a restored office building
– private spaces gathered towards the front, public towards the back
– entry is a little long, needs a closet
– living room has no focal point but string connection to exterior through large windows
– no outdoor living space
– efficient layout of kitchen
– no identified dining room in plan. Would imagine it would be relatively easy to tuck one into the very large living space
– bedroom has no natural light (possibly why it’s called a study?), layout is fine
– two bathrooms, decently laid out; however, seems a little excessive to have that second full bathroom given that just a powder room I’m sure would have sufficed
– study has no natural light, actually the only bedroom
– laundry receives a yes mainly because of its location. Although still in a closet, the closet is tucked into an unusable back corner of the en suite. High degree of privacy, and allows for someone to work directly in front of it
– secure, garage parking listed in amenities
- I picked this plan because it was interesting for a few reasons: laundry room being in the en suite and because of that very strong divide between the public and private space
- Also, the hint of an entry space was encouraging
Comment: 98 walk score; I think I gave this one the bedroom & bathroom points because I felt sorry for it. So awful! It faces east; the dining table would have to be in the “kitchen” (term used loosely); I think the main entry might be in the kitchen, as the other door (with stairs next to it) appears to lead nowhere (if it’s a terrace, it isn’t drawn – this unit is on the 23rd floor, so it must go somewhere! fire escape?) …
– one of the first, multifamily LEED certified developments in uptown Dallas
– no real information on siting
– unit is divided almost in half –> private spaces on the right, public on the left
– entry is a little tight, but it is defined
– Niche in wall in living/bedroom wall provides a focal point for furniture, good connection to the exterior
– good size exterior terrace, easily accessible through both bedroom and living room
– good size kitchen, efficient, nice to have it tucked at back so bedroom and living room enjoy window exposure
– dining room boasts lots of space
– bedroom is a good size, good ventilation, for the most part good floor plan, except the wasted space created in the bottom left-hand corner due to angled exterior walls.
- bathroom well laid out, easily accessible as the primary bathroom for the unit
– no study
- has a proper laundry room with enough floor space to work in front of machines.
MollyK,
I’ve just looked at the three 1900 McKinney apts. you posted. I think that Unit I that you gave 18 to should be lowered by one, since the second bedroom has no window. In all three the terrace space seems very limited, only large enough to stand and look out. There is the rooftop outdoor space, just one floor up, so possibly that was what you counted as outdoor living? Or was it the view that gave it the point?
Mid America Mom
Comment: This building is sold out but I took a look anyways. I choose the fourth floor north facing one bedroom unit.
I like seeing the L shaped kitchen, Dishwasher on the RIGHT (YEAH!) with the boxed in refrigerator. The living and dining has plenty of light and the width is good. The breakfast bar wraps around so two people are able to converse without getting a neck cramp (((John and Matthew what are the design considerations for breakfast bars? I think shoulder to shoulder seating is NOT good for conversation))).
*
The laundry is in a kitchen closet where there is no where to put a basket but on the kitchen floor (yuck). The bedroom is about our ideal size (12*10) but you have a great view into the bathroom – TOLIET (who thought that was a good idea?)! Do you really need a dual sink and the walk in wet room area in back? AND another half bath. No to bathroom question. The walk in closet has wasted space. I think you can only have a rod on the back wall.
Alejandro,
Wow, those Neil P units are bizarre–walking through bedrooms to use the toilet. I wonder if this is something quite acceptable down there?
Paulina
Comment: Hi guys, I did a couple for the Metropolitan too! I tried to find a good one and a not so good one… This one is the good one. Points off for it’s lack of enviro. features, east facing which is good, but not enough to get the point. Bath 2 annoyed me, overcoming the decent master ensuite, because of the toilet and sink locations – it would have been SO easy to switch them and avoid issue!
Comment: Another from Mercer Square.
*
Found a condo in dallas with an entry closet and I think shelves as well!
*
The master bath suffers same fate as last unit. THe closet is OVERSIZED. The second bath has a weird entry angle and the closet there looks too small to be a good walk in.
Corey, We got the wrong URL for Lake Cliff Towers. I was interested in your comment re: going through bedroom to access bathroom…
Paulina
Comment: Hot north (small side) and west facing corner unit, with a weird layout in spite of decent proportions. Narrow bowling alley living room, a giant dining room, and wasted space in between.
The Shelton is wasted space everywhere. Wilson bad organization. Oh that 1 bed AR unit is like a trailer set up – worse than M. So narrow .. Is the only window in the living?
Mid America Mom
Terri
Corey, That apt 204C at the Palomar has the WORST master bedroom I’ve ever seen! A huge space with a minuscule window at the end of a long, narrow niche–what?
Sarah W
Comment: These plans are really hard to read! I apologize if my analysis is a bit off (you’ll see why if you go to the website). 98 walk score; I am intrigued and confused by this building… since it was repurposed, maybe the existing structure forced the designers to lay out the units in this awkward way.
Comment: The deck looks great on the side of the building when viewed from outside but does not have much usable space. From the plan the kitchen appears to have no real counter space for food prep. I also hate the fact that you have to go through the bedroom to get to the bathroom if you were a guest.
Comment: Gated community. No information for site or overall building. No north arrow. Worst parts? The w/d in the toilet room, the joke of a dining room, no room to move in the bathroom, a useless balcony since you have to walk through your bedroom to use it, and NO FRIDGE!
If this is right…Yikes the bedroom is next to the elevator!
Mid America Mom
Terri
M.A.M., I don’t know about that Buzz loft that you gave a score of 20. Those “Flex” spaces might as well say, “You figure it out.” If you want totally open loft space though, it’s got it.
Andrew
Comment: Another from that same gated community. This one has a living room with no place to put a tv and has a corner fp just to throw everything off. Again, no fridge! breakfast is really the dining room. No outdoor space at all. Laundry is cramped there at the end of the kitchen.
spot on Terri – my thoughts exactly. I think that the whole “open loft feel” thing is just a way to cut costs based on cool. I don’t know if I want to sleep in my living room every day cool or not.
Wayne
Comment: There is nothing that really stands out as the dinning area, which given the space should have been achieved. The master bedroom also seems a bit small, it is almost the same size as the den.
Comment: 86 walk score; the closets are huge!! (the 2nd bedroom’s closet is almost the same size as the room itself). I don’t have a problem with the overall layout of this unit, but I do not like that they threw in unnecessary angles everywhere, and it ruins it for me. This looks like a corner unit, but I couldn’t find a site plan to tell me if it was & where it faces.
Project Name: Pecan Place Condos (#310)
Size: 1990
Project Address: 04 East 1st Street, Fort Worth, TX
Terri,
I see what you mean about the lack of a window in the bedroom in Unit I, 27th floor.
With respect to the terrace, I am lenient when scoring outdoor living spaces in High-rise buildings. There are pros and cons for both large and small terraces. My overall feeling is that having a balcony in general is something to be thankful for in these buildings. If it includes a nice view then I’m less likely to penalize it for less than ideal square footage.
Terri
M.A.M.,
Thanks for posting the url for Corey’s Lake Cliff Tower unit. You’re right–the bedroom is next to the elevator. One would think they could have put the walk-in/laundry closet at that corner as it’d be next to the bathroom as well. Also, what about a bedroom door?
Mid America Mom
Terri and Alejandro thank you for responding to the Buzz Loft perfect score I posted. You could not market that as anything but loft (and apartment therapy here I come for furniture ideas)! Anyone else have a thought to share?
Mid America Mom
Catherine Taney
Comment: Balcony is too small, master bathroom too big, second bath is too small. Enviro features, but bad orientation (west). Enter unit right into dining room.
HI MollyK I also had my eye on THE HOUSE. I was looking at the one bed plan 6.0- would you care to post it? I will try to find info on green. Google here I come :)
Matt KB
Comment: There is not site plan so i have no idea which direction is north. Further they say “Private Terrace” however it is not on the plan so i don’t know the size and if it is of appropriate size to actually be usable.
Comment: 55 walk score; the website notes that “all sizes & layouts are approximate and subject to change” – maybe not a good sign? I don’t like the shape of the bathroom, but there’s nothing else really wrong with it. I don’t like that you would have to carry dirty laundry through the kitchen!
Comment: Walkscore: 88/100. No information on Energy-efficient features.
Couldn’t tell where entry was…there seemed to be 2 doors from the corridor into the Hallway.
Was lenient on Masterbath which had some wasted space in front of toilet…other bathrooms were fine.
Comment: This was an interesting project to look at because of the curved facade.
Overall the plan is quite successful at dealing with the colliding geometry. My only complaint is that there is no real dining area.
Comment: This is a really large floor plan for a one bedroom. Also there was no north arrow on the site plan but this unit faces north east (according to google maps. I gave the living room 0 because there is no place for a tv or fire
Whoopsie, looks like Mid America Mom already did this one. Sorry! I though it was a well designed unit except for bedrooms, bathrooms and study. It’s still on the slow end of the scale though, so I think it’s very livable.
Matt KB
Comment: The Plan is so bad! the totally ridiculous 45 degree angles everywhere should make it a nominee for Fastest home ever! I gave the outdoor space a 0 because it is spatially ridiculous (although it is there). I gave the plan a 4 but i really want to give it a 3 because i hate the bedroom.
Comment: 74 walk score; I gave it the environmental point since it’s in a restored old building. The plan is bare (no fixtures/appliances), so I had to use my imagination…
Comment: 66 walk score; again, I gave it the environmental point because it’s a repurposed historic building. There looks like a bit of wasted space in the bathroom, and the bedroom wont get too much light, but this place is not bad overall. I do like that it’s a 1920s concrete warehouse!
Comment: This is another great unit, the only thing I really dislike is the fact that the entry leads directly into the kitchen. A strategic placement of a wall or a partial wall would easily solve this problem.
Comment: I always like to look at one of the smallest units in a complex compared to one of the largest units in a complex, and every single time the flow in the larger units falls apart. This unit has some nice spaces, but there are too many hallways which waste space. How do you put furniture in the living room without blocking the path from the front door to the kitchen?
MidAmericaMom – I saw it as a loft, but I don’t think that loft necessarily means that you can’t have a separated bedroom – it doesn’t have to be enclosed with a door, but I need some millwork or something to believe this can work.
MollyK
M.A.M.
Be my guest with TheHouse…there is an 8000+ square foot floorplan if your eyes are up to it. I simply gave up on it. Instead of admitting defeat my excuse was that such a high-rise home was not realistic so why score it. But it is worth looking at…thought BradW would enjoy the space!
Comment: Walkscore: 85/100. This floorplan matches the apartments numbered 214,314,414,etc. and has a South-facing orientation only. The website does mention energy-efficient windows, HVAC, multi-cycle dishwasher (which usually indicates more efficient use of water).
Overall, the size of the unit (only 671 sf) negatively impacts the livability of the space.
Project Name: Plan A1 (The Vista)
Size: 671 sf
Project Address: The Vista, 2345 N. Houston ST., Dallas TX 75219
Comment: This is a very large unit. The multiple living spaces are well done and the single dining space is good. There is a lot of circulation. The entry should have a closet. Orientation is lacking (north by northwest) the direct light it does get will be hot and glaring. Siting it good.
Comment: This Loft did well on the test, but there are some significant issues. The living dining space is awkward. There is and entrance but it feels incomplete – so I did not give it the entry point.
Comment: A good unit but maybe a bit big for only 1 bedroom, 1.5 baths, and a study. The study and bedroom are very nice. Points lost on environmental performance.
M.A.M.
Thanks so much for the link to jetsongreen. Funny thing is that the site looked familiar and I checked my “favorites” list and it was in there. I forgot I had it.
What a slamming article…so nice to get information that puts the whole scenario into perspective!
Anonymous
Comment: The main problem with this plan is the bathroom is only accessible through the bedroom. Also the walk-in closet is inefficient.
Comment: 20/20. A nice compact unit. Everything in the interior is in proportion and reasonable. A functional place to live. Southwest facing in a LEED building – the NW orientation of the last one overshadowed the LEED rating.
Comment: Again with the N orientation. I could be generous with this, but I think that the environmental features are trumped by the less than satisfactory orientation. For a big unit this is well designed. The double living space is effective. The organization is good. The bathrooms are modest. If this unit were facing south, 20/20.
Comment: Well organized with a loft living area and a big terrace. The second bedroom is a bit small and the study desk is too small to be effective. Northwest orientation gets hot late day sun. No issues with neighbors.
Comment: There isn’t an entrance at all in this unit. The relationship of the kitchen to living and dining seems a little off – the kitchen is half facing the side of the fire place. That being said I think that it’s interesting to use the double sided fire place to separate the living and dining rooms.
Comment: The zig-zag partition between the living space and the bedroom would make it very difficult to situate furniture, and would create a lot of wasted space.
It very interesting to see how the promotional strategies change from city to city. the slogan for this building is “The side you choose will be your own” with an animation of two basketball players. I didn’t see anything like this in Los Angeles or Toronto.
~Dominique
Project Name: Canal Side Lofts
Size: 757
Project Address: 350 East Las Colinas Blvd. Irving,
Comment: A small south-east facing unit. Good overall layout but the entry is a hallway by the kitchen. There is no dining area. The biggest issue is that the only bathroom is an ensuite.
Comment: The second bedroom/study makes this unit not very effective. The room is too small to be a good bed room and at the same time takes up too much floor space in the living area. As a study, it is undermined by the HVAC located in the room (imagine the noise!). There is no dining area and the kitchen is too small. The entry is too narrow and conflicts with the laundry and the kitchen.
Comment: This is another plan where the bathroom is only accessible through the bed room which I don’t think is a good idea. I’m not sure what I think about the curved wall in the middle of the unit. Initially I thought is was problematic but it kind of works. I’m just not sure about it’s relationship with the dining room.
Walkability test – 85 points
~Dominique
Project Name: Cirquevictory Park
Size: 939 sq/ft
Project Address: 2500 N. Houston St. Dallas, Texas 75219
Comment: There are two big problems with this unit. The dining area is too small and conflicts with the laundry and the circulation to the master bedroom. The second issue is the kitchen. There is wasted floor space and a lack of counter space to do work on.
Project Name: Parkside @ Cedar Springs: Flat Residence F3
Hey scott- I could not recall if you were new or not to this part of the project- if so welcome!
If not (or in addition too), thanks for the comment on the loft development.
Mid America Mom
Braden
Comment: Just on this side of the walkscore (57/100). Originally a 1928 hotel and residences. South facing central unit. Don’t like the symmetrically split private spaces, and the lack of definition to the larger public area (kitchen/living/dining). The kitchen is too open to the dining area and entry (which is just a door I might add). Laundry in the closet seems like a good idea, but then what does the other person do? Get a second washer/dryer for their closet? Silly. Also, 2 ensuites = no bathroom for guests.
Comment: SE corner unit – main living area definition issues, long circulation to get to bathroom (!), entry is a narrow hallway, and the study isn’t separated enough from the living area to have privacy. There is room for a dining table, but you’re basically sitting in the kitchen and it is then hard to walk around the table every day to get to the entry/bedroom.
Terri – As Mentioned the Units are Lofts, not the Residences. You can find the ‘lofts’ right under where it says ‘residences’ on the left hand side. There you can toggle.
Corey
M.A.M.,
Thanks for posting the URL… Don’t know how that happened!
Mid America Mom
Comment: Things to like. Walk is 97!
Lowrise infill development, next door to this unit is a home.
2 bed, 2 bath, AND an actual study with not just one but TWO windows.
Corner unit with windows on both sides. NE.
Good size dining and living space
Full size washer and dryer in its own private location
Actual entry with closet near by.
6 by 12 balcony
Issues: No mention of GREEN. Lots of walking in this unit so No to organization. Oversized master bedroom, closet, and bath. Long and curved angle in the entry to living space. Odd curve carries to the second bath which looks to have wasted space. Second bedroom closet seems shallow (is it even 5 deep?). For a place this size and the space is there so the double Galley kitchen needs: a longer island, more counterspace, and the stove door should not be in danger of hitting your behind! Oh I forgave them on a lack of door to the study.
Thanks for all the posts today! We are getting a real kick start out of the gate in Texas! Looks like the week of rest did everyone some good!
Cat
Comment: Thought we needed some more Ft. Worth representation. Walk score of 88. No mention of any green features. I like the double balconies. I couldn’t find a site plan or orientation of the unit.
Project Name: So7 Art House Condo Lots (#3502 — Plan C5)
Comment: Walk score of 88. (oops So7, above. walk score is 75 not 88). Balcony is on the south side. I couldn’t find any mention of green features. Unit 617 is interesting also.
Project Name: Museum Place Condos (605, 607, 609)
Size: 1047 sq ft
Project Address: 3300 West 7th Street Fort Worth, TX 76107
I have noticed that DFW has more than it’s far share of large condos and lofts – I guess it just helps prove the old adage that everything is bigger in Texas. Come to think of it, when I was in Houston I did notice a number of women with big…hair. :)
MollyK has been asking for some entertainment on the blog – usually, I provide an interesting home to look at but I am saving that for later. This time I am showing a clip from the PBS documentary Objectified by Gary Hustwit. In this short clip, Karim Rashid talks about design. I hope you enjoy it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vK6nyp8fPrg&NR=1&feature=fvwp
Vickie
Comment: Walkability score of 66%
The Entry is arguable – becomes narrow with the kitchen counter, but there is a closet… Although the laundry is right behind the door – can cause some space jams when in the middle of laundry!
Even though kitchen counter is a funky angle, it still works… right?
Project Name: Canal Side Lofts on Las Colinas
Size: 760 sq. ft.
Project Address: 350 East Las Colinas Blvd. Irving
Comment: Walk score of 80%
They are ‘proud to be recognized and associated with’ US Green building council, although I couldn’t find any specific details as to how they are…
As for the bedroom – the closet seems to be very far!
They seem to have integrated this residential building appropriately in the city (looking from google street), as they included commercial on the ground floor.
Comment: Walk score of 80%
What an interesting unit. Ummmm – the closet at the entry – is that even allowed?!
Unfortunately the outdoor living space seems to be quite a maze to get to (slight exaggeration).
Project Name: The Davis Building – Floor 4, Unit 410 G2
Corey,
Thanks for pointing out how to find the lofts at the Palomar Residences–I missed that little choice. I agree that the unit you chose (305F)is well laid out. Nice to see a powder room and a laundry room. My only (little) criticism is the small terrace, which is accessed from bedroom only. I’m assuming the large living room windows offer a good view…
Wtgrating WayTong A nice looking project. I have same feel that a minimum dimension of about 5 feet by 3 feet is required - cabinetry has to... An In Depth Look At Apt/Lofts In Denver
Kurt Grosse As a former Nevada building engineer and 25-year Realtor, I love Beazer Homes Las Vegas. Their home construction is generally good. Every home will have... 05/04/10 - Dallas/Fort Worth - Single Family
Dale Edmonton I was glad to read that In the first segment of a three-part series on the LG House by Louis Pereira of third stone inc.... LG House by thirdstone inc. [^] Part 1