An In Depth Look At Townhomes In Chicago

This is Day 219 of the Slow Home Project and we need you to join us in our quest to evaluate the design quality of houses in nine North American cities in nine months.

Today is Thursday, August 26, 2010 and we are doing an “In Detail” review of kitchen design in townhouses. All of the examples we are using today are from the Chicago area.

Townhouses tend to be long and narrow in plan, and as such the placement of the kitchen is a really critical design decision. As we have seen in many of the cities in the Slow Home Project, in townhouses, problems can arise when the kitchen is either too big, cut off from other living spaces or in the way of of the a major circulation route.

We need you to look through the floor plans from the Chicago area and find examples of both good and bad kitchen designs, post them to the site and leave us a comment. We look forward to the discussion!

When you are ready, you can watch John and Matthew’s tutorial on kitchen design in townhouses by clicking on the player below.

To see the examples from today’s tutorial in more detail, click on the links below.

1. This is a well designed “L” shaped town house kitchen. It is backed into the corner and has a good relationship to the other principal spaces.

2. This is a good example of a galley kitchen. There is about 3 foot six inches between the counters and the appliance triangle is nice and compact. It would be even better if the pass through was an eating bar with stools.

3. This is a good peninsula kitchen. The kitchen is well laid out, but it is too bad the adjacent guest bathroom opens directly into the kitchen.

4. This is a badly designed “L” shaped kitchen with an island that is oriented the in the wrong direction. There is really not enough room for a table and the guest bathroom is immediately adjacent to the kitchen.

5. This is poorly designed “U” shaped kitchen with too much floor space and a view from the dining table directly into the kitchen work triangle.

6. This is really bad kitchen design with a 45 degree angled counter that wastes space and pinches the sink, a poorly placed island and a fridge location that is too far from the other appliances.

7. This “L” shaped kitchen has no place for a breakfast table – even though the plan indicates that it would fit – and the guest bath and laundry – which is too large – are right in the kitchen space itself.

8. This kitchen is poorly located in plan and the work area is in the middle of all the circulation for the house.

9. This kitchen floor plan again states that there is room for a “breakfast” area, but the space is really too small. Notice that the counter on one side is only twelve inches deep but needs to be 24 inches minimum to be functional.

Make sure you join us tomorrow for our review of the Design Projects from Wednesday, our vote for who you think should win the Slow Home Award for Best Townhouse Design in Chicago and the winner of Slow Homer of the Week!

  • Mid America Mom

    Good morning! This is my place to break from packing boxes :) John, I hope you will have some more slow home reports and winners in previous cities to share.

    BradW and I have posted more redesigns on yesterday’s thread. Guess we really like planning with this plan. I admit that the width makes it a bit easier to play with.

    Mid America Mom

  • Terri

    Re: the kitchen discussion.
    This plan has all the elements for a Slow Home, but it doesn’t work for me. First, the sink jammed in the L; second, the way you have to circle around the island every time you want to enter the kitchen–I think it’d be better with elements along the stair wall and a peninsula for the eating bar (attached at bottom of plan) so that it’d be easier to access this room.
    http://unionrowtownhomes.com/downloads/Union_Row_Floorplan_A.pdf

  • Terri

    Here is a kitchen where the access is open on either end of the island. I like this freedom of movement better.
    http://www.wrightwoodcrossing.com/floor-plan.html

  • Mid America Mom

    Kitchen design… I like an open country kitchen so #5 is just fine with me. Hey there is room in the test for bias – like location having a horrid walk score but live two blocks from work.

    ******

    Horrible design – Ryland Home’s Chelsea model – http://www.ryland.com/find-your-new-home/5-chicago/4302-cedar-grove-townhomes/16071-chelsea.html This front of the plan kitchen has numerous issues that I cannot list them all or I will get a finger cramp! First it cannot figure out what configuration it wants to be. The placement of the sink is baffling. They planned for some table in the middle but it really is a hole of wasted space. There is little room between the stove and refrigerator. The refrigerator is badly placed in relation to the dining room. And more…

    And for GOOD Design I call upon my favorite shape – the U. This U, part of the Market Street Development, http://www.marketstreetwestcondos.com/downloads/MarketStreet_unit107.pdf is placed in the dark part of the plan and is basically a square. The triangle is quite defined and workable. One leg doubles as breakfast bar.

    Mid America Mom

  • Terri

    This kitchen has all the elements again without wasted space, but it would be rather dark to work in, and sitting at the island would be similarly dreary, facing no light whatsoever.
    http://www.magellandevelopment.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/427.pdf

  • Terri

    An odd corner in this kitchen is way too deep to be used effectively–maybe it’s supposed to have one of those appliance garages on it. The island doesn’t quite cut off the work triangle, but it’s close. Yet it’s redundant, because there’s a breakfast nook across the room.
    http://www.newhavenchicago.com/LW_Unit_5.htm

  • Terri

    A gigantic fridge-sink-stove triangle here. Tiny breakfast nook, PLUS a little eating bar around the corner. All in all, it gets 0 on the Slow Home Test (that’s what I gave it).
    http://www.newhavenchicago.com/THOTS-E.htm

  • Terri

    Ryland Homes is building the Chelsea in a couple of places–Cedar Grove and Gilberts. This kitchen splits the work area across the room (sink on one side and fridge/stove on other), but not only that, they expect you to put a table in there. Of course, their brochure shows a tiny bistro unit there (photo taken looking toward the windows–probably the best thing about this room).
    http://www.ryland.com/find-your-new-home/5-chicago/1297-gilberts-town-center-luxury-townhomes/12960-chelsea.html
    Okay…that’s it from moi.

  • Terri

    M.A.M.
    I missed your post while I was grabbing links from the project page. Yes, I agree that there’s always room for bias in these evaluations.
    I see we agree on the Chelsea though.:)

  • nicole

    good design_Heritage Homes_plan G2:
    http://newwestrealty.com/c/p/fp/?cid=11&pt=6&m=296
    Very compact – some counter space, good work triangle, connected to other principle spaces, no unnecessary angles. Only comment : might be a bit tight for more than one person to be in the kitchen at once.

    Not so good design: chelsea in cedar grove
    http://www.ryland.com/find-your-new-home/5-chicago/4302-cedar-grove-townhomes/16071-chelsea.html
    wasted space – not a good work triangle (too big), but is somewhat orientated to other principle spaces.

  • Tara

    Here’s a townhouse project with two extremes in kitchen design.
    In the Addison and Cornelia plans, the kitchen is very narrow, with maybe three feet between the two counter surfaces.
    In the Bentley, the kitchen is massive with a HUGE amount of wasted floorspace in the centre. I have no idea why they would not want to put an island in a kitchen this size. Even if they meant for the owner to place a table in the kitchen (which would sit right next to the dining room table), the extended work triangle would make it impossible to move around the table in the kitchen properly.
    The narrow, u-shaped kitchen would have been good if it had a bit more floorspace in the centre to make it more comfortable to work in.
    http://www.corneliacourt.com/

  • Grace Coulter

    [img]designprojecttownhomechicagogracelayout1.jpg[/img]

    Hey everyone,
    i noticed my design file from yesterday didn’t show up in the postings. Here it is again. There is a kitchen pantry and a closet in the front in case there is confusion.

    http://www.ryland.com/find-your-new-home/5-chicago/4302-cedar-grove-townhomes/16073-dunmore.html

    this is the link to one of the homes i looked at this week. the breakfast nook is useless because of the pantry door swing and there is too much space over all allotted to the kitchen.
    cheers

  • Grace Coulter

    [img]3_designprojecttownhomechicagogracelayout1.jpg[/img]

    for some strange reason slow home will not let me post!
    this is my fourth attempt today.
    here is my design file from yesterday that didn’t show up.

  • Grace Coulter

    and i looked at this example today of a house i found earlier this week. the breakfast nook is useless because of the size and door swing of the pantry. overall there is too much space dedicated to the kitchen.
    http://www.ryland.com/find-your-new-home/5-chicago/4302-cedar-grove-townhomes/16073-dunmore.html

  • Grace Coulter
  • Grace Coulter
  • Andrew

    [img]screenshot20100827at12.56.jpg[/img]

    I think this is an example of a good kitchen design. It might be a bit small, but I think the “peninsula” design here works well and helps divide the kitchen from the living/dining space. For such a small apartment, it’s a bit surprising to see a kitchen as well-design as this one.

  • Andrew

    Whoops, I posted an apartment plan instead of a townhouse. Here is a townhouse design that has an ok kitchen. The kitchen space itself has a decent layout but I think it divides this floor in half with the walls that partially enclose it – this level could probably have benefited from a more open plan.

  • Andrew

    [img]1_screenshot20100827at1.06.jpg[/img]

    .