An In Depth Look At Townhomes In Denver

This is Day 100 of the Slow Home Project, and we need you to join us in our quest to evaluate the design quality of houses in nine North American cities in nine months. This week we are analyzing townhomes in Denver and today we are going to be doing an in detail review of the bedroom question on the Slow Home Test.

Today we are looking at bedroom design for our “In Detail” segment. As you will remember from the “Slow Home Test”, a bedroom is well designed if it has natural ventilation and light, well proportioned closets and the room itself is properly sized to fit a bed. Sadly, there are too many houses that are built without these basic bedroom design fundamentals.

Let’s look at some good and bad examples of bedroom design in townhouses from the Denver area. To guide this discussion, we will be looking at the issues of size, shape, proportion and closets.

This is an example of a bad bedroom design as the townhouse is really too narrow to accommodate two bedrooms side by side. The 45 degree angles to get access to these rooms reduces the effective size of the bedrooms even more. A good rule of thumb is that a bedroom needs to be a minimum of 10 feet in any direction.

This is an example of two well designed bedrooms in a townhouse with one larger and one smaller bedroom sitting front and back.

This is an example of badly designed bedrooms that are irregular in shape and would be difficult to furnish.

This is an example of a badly designed bedroom with a 45 degree angle which disrupts furniture placement and circulation to the ensuite.

This is also a badly designed master bedroom with too many focal points. Notice how almost every wall has a feature like the fireplace, a window or
door. How would the furniture be placed in this room?

This is an example of a bedroom with good proportion. Notice how there is a good distance from the door into the bedroom to the bed.

This is an example of bad proportion in a bedroom. As you can see, there is
hardly any space from the door to the bed and the room is too wide.

These are examples of poorly designed closets. These closets bump into the room and take up valuable floor space as well as disrupt circulation.

This is an example of a “classic” and good way to design closets. They are embedded into the wall and also provide a degree of sound separation between the two rooms.

We want to hear what you think is important about bedroom design in a town house. Post your comments and let’s have a discussion.

Join us tomorrow when we will be doing our Friday wrap-up on townhomes, discussing the design projects and announcing the Slow Homer of the Week!

  • MollyK

    Good morning everyone,
    The tutorial was very informative…and brought to mind a couple of points.

    Diagonal entries from the hallway alone don’t bother me since you are naturally drawn either to the left or right of the bed as you enter the room. The master bedroom in John’s ‘good closet’ example has a diagonal entry from the hallway. Yet, it doesn’t have a negative impact on other areas of the suite.
    However, what is bad to me is when a diagonal entry causes a negative ‘ripple effect’ on other features in the room: reducing the size of the closet or space for the bed; creating odd angles in the bathroom which often result in crazy-shaped showers or angled counter tops; or creating unusable space in the bedroom that is mislabled as a “sitting area”…which leads me to Matthew’s jiggy-jogs.

    IMO, the jiggy-jog (or ‘awkward shape’ as John puts it) can be useful as long as there is adequate space dedicated for bed placement. If the home doesn’t have a study or a second living space for kids then a jiggy-jog becomes a functional area. It can hold a desk for paperwork or a chair (maybe two depending on the size) for quiet repose. Of course, it shouldn’t impede on other areas in the room such as closet or bathroom space.

    One other quick note…the comparison of the bedrooms with regards to proportion was a real “Ah-ha” moment. At first glance I would have criticized the “good” example for having tight circulation between the bed and tv console, but it makes more sense functionally to have the extra space relegated for sitting on the opposite side of the bed. The empty space in the “bad” example has no function…except to force those of us who need glasses to use them in bed.

  • Lukas Armstrong

    John and Matthew,

    I’d like to thank-you for posting these. I am currently designing four homes and as a new designer I have been using them like mini tutorials on what to watch for when space planning within tight constraints.

    Great work!

  • Matthew North

    Lukas – I am happy to hear that you find these tutorials helpful – good luck with the home designs!

  • Mid America Mom

    Hi- I have started this lengthy response and thought I may not end up posting it. So in case I wanted to throw this out:

    I disagree that rooms need to be a min. 10 feet. It is nice round number though. A single or queen bed take up about 6/7 feet with a headboard and if you allot 30 inches to pass in front of it , so approx 9.5 feet. Townhomes are notorious for being the width of a standard 2 car garage and achieving an interior dimension of 19.5 is realistic. With one 2*4 interior wall we can have two equal rooms about 9.5. I understand that the dimension around the bed differs on bed size. About 8 for a single and 10 for queen. Just had to say that when we are seeing them trying to squeeze everything they can in the Toronto condo market in regards to bedrooms. Mid America Mom